Tuesday, 16 May 2017

Akbari jatts and Darbari Jatts

Akbari and Darbari Jatts


"the Darbari Jats, the descendants of those who gave their daughters to Emperor Jahangir, just as the Akbaris gave daughters to Akbar. Thus, some of the Mann Jats of Tuto Mazara are Darbaris, but they will take brides for their sons from non-Darbaris, provided the dowry (dahej) is ample."
by http://punjabrevenue.nic.in/fdigs.htm

"Among the Jats the only social distinctions are the well known 'Akbari' or Darbari makans--35 in number according to the usual accounts.But in Amritsar the Akbari is only the highest of a series of four grades,the Aurangzebi(those admitted to this rank during the rule of Aurangzahib),Khalsai(or those admitted during Sikh times) and Angrezi(of those admitted since British ruler began) being the other three,and no less than 150 villages,all generally speaking in the Manjha,now claim Darbari status.There is also a Shahjahuani grade,the Sansi Jats,of Raja Sansi,having been admitted in the reign of Shah Jahan.The origin of the Akbari group is thus described.When the emperor Akbar took in marriage the daughter of Mihr Mithan,a Jat,of the Manjha,35 of the principal Jat,and 36 of the leading Rajput families countenanced the marriage and sent representatives to Delhi....The Akbari Jats follow some of the higher castes in not allowing remarriage of widows,and in practising darbara,which is a custom of giving vails at weddings to the mirasis of other Akbari families.Below the Akbari is the Darbari grade,descendants of those who gave their daughters to the emperor Jahangir...." by F.A Rose
Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North West ..., Volume 1 - page 377




प्रूफ के लिए लिंक सरकारी वेबसाइट पंजाब रेवेन्यू बोर्ड की साईट और Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North West ..., Volume 1 - page 377 है


इनकी ओरतो को मुगल रखैल का दर्जा देते थे


9 comments:

  1. This is written in vol 2 not in vol 1. please amend.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What about Rajputs they also gives their daughters to mughals . Mughals were also depicted the same about Rajputs womens "rakhel"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah its true but jat women are concubine(rakhails)for the physical hunger of mughals

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. What nonsense are you spreading, Mr. Faisal? What concern is this to a Muslim? Anyway, "Akbari" or "Durbari" Jats are never mentioned anywhere, not even in Ain-i-Akbari written by Akbar's court, until the 19th century by British. If this group even exists, where are they now?

      Delete
  3. Bro last line nhi likni chahiye thi United we stand divided we fall

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rkhel putra jat😂😂😂

    ReplyDelete
  5. If these Jats exist, where are they now? They were just written into existence by a British man. Not even Ain-i-Akbari mentions these "Akbari" or "Durbari" Jats, so on what authority was he spewing all this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is more likely that, if such a categorization even exists, it refers to those who took service in Mughal and other administration. Hence also the Khalsei and Angrezei categories (i.e. those who served in the Sikh and British Indian armies).

      Delete